[Original title: Massa-individualisering en de agrofoodsector]
Mass-individualisation is a relative new container
notion. In this study it is interpreted as similar to the Anglo-Saxon
term agility. Formulated in broad terms, MI refers to the transformation
process of enterprises in developed economies towards business
and production processes which are designed to meet the (continuously)
varying and (quickly) changing desires and demands of (many and
different) customers. Stated succinctly, MI is all about creating
advanced supply systems capable of (fine) tuning supply to demand.
Demand which is subject to ever increasing paces of change. Roughly,
MI is in many senses the opposite of mass-production (MP). And
as MP has become dominant in the 20th century, MI is
expected to take MP's place in the course of the 21st
century.
Starting form this (MI) perspective on the future,
we have looked for a number of driving forces behind this process.
We have selected three drivers: changing consumer behaviour, ICT-developments,
and shifting patterns of power. Based on these three drivers we
describe the "movement" of mass-individualisation -
or agility. In an agile world, one of the keywords is transparency.
Important resulting developments are the emergence of new types
of businesses (the so-called neutral service providers), new (non-hierarchical)
forms of co-operation and new power players. These developments
will result in the emergence of (region) networks or clusters,
which contribute to enable the required agility (see figure below
for an overview).
In the study indications can be found as to were
the Dutch knowledge base could be fortified, that is, seen from
the broad perspective of MI. In this respect, knowledge domains
are formulated for both (commercial) businesses and government.
Three important areas of knowledge and research are brought up.
The first one is the broad domain of ICT. It is important
to develop specific knowledge as to the way we can effectively
and willfully use ICT to increase the transparency in networks.
Closely connected to the first domain is the second
domain which concerns the importance to increase our knowledge
about organising (non-hierarchical) networks or clusters. Which
models are thinkable? What roles or functions need to be fulfilled?
The third field of knowledge involves the quest for
developments that are characterising the realm of human and social
dynamics. Knowledge on this subject will provide important clues
for ways to organise networks, to develop new marketing- and retail
concepts, to protect certain public interests, or how to communicate
and to relate.
From an organisational perspective, it is suggested
to link the development of the MI knowledge domains to the existing
knowledge infrastructure. Integration of the mentioned domains
in the KLICT-program, whilst at the same time using the existing
chain and network science expertise, offers opportunities for
increasing the body of knowledge on MI.
It is suggested that the use of a cluster approach
is an appropriate tool for joining the forces of (commercial)
businesses, (public) knowledge infrastructure, and government.
The combination of know-how, practical experience, and focused
policy, will contribute to an agile agro-food business which faces
the future with confidence.